Legal Opinion from Guohao Law Firm (Shenzhen) on the 2025 Annual Shareholders' Meeting of Guangdong Hongchuan Smart Logistics Co., Ltd.
To: Guangdong Hongchuan Smart Logistics Co., Ltd.
Guohao Law Firm (Shenzhen) (hereinafter referred to as "this firm") has been entrusted by Guangdong Hongchuan Smart Logistics Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") to appoint lawyers Peng Yao and Ji Junhong (hereinafter referred to as "the Firm's Lawyers") to attend the Company's 2025 Annual Shareholders' Meeting (hereinafter referred to as "this Shareholders' Meeting" or "this Meeting") to witness the legality of this Shareholders' Meeting.
The Firm's Lawyers have issued this legal opinion based on the provisions of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the Company Law"), the Rules for Shareholders' Meetings of Listed Companies, and other relevant laws, regulations, and normative documents, as well as the Articles of Association of Guangdong Hongchuan Smart Logistics Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the Articles of Association"). This legal opinion addresses the convening and holding procedures of the Shareholders' Meeting, the qualifications of attendees, the qualifications of the convener, the voting procedures, and the voting results.
In this legal opinion, the Firm's Lawyers only express opinions on whether the convening and holding procedures, the qualifications of attendees, the qualifications of the convener, the voting procedures, and the voting results comply with relevant laws, regulations, other normative documents, and the Articles of Association. The Firm's Lawyers do not express opinions on the content of the proposals discussed at the meeting or the authenticity and accuracy of the facts or data presented in these proposals.
According to the recognized business standards, ethical norms, and diligence of the legal profession, the Firm's Lawyers have verified and validated the relevant materials and facts of this Shareholders' Meeting, and now present the following legal opinions: